NOTE: Pictures posted on the regular version of the list are deleted from the digest and are archived separately. Viewing them requires a password available exclusively to list members. Member Profiles posted to the list are also moved into a separate viewing area, but do not require a password. Please click here to browse through them.

silverfoxesclub-digest
Friday, November 10 2000
Volume 01 : Number 041

In this issue:

-Group Roams Chat Rooms to Talk to Gay Men About AIDS
-Kissing may spread Kaposis sarcoma (+ response)
-Election protests
-Frank coasts to easy victory (+ several responses)
-The Only Votes that Really Count

----------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 13:46:13 -0500 (ET)
From: Edward

Subject: Group Roams Chat Rooms to Talk to Gay Men About AIDS

From today's NY Times.

Edward
-----------------------
November 9, 2000

Group Roams Chat Rooms to Talk to Gay Men About AIDS
By CHRIS GAITHER

WHERE men meet men for sex, health agencies are sure to follow. In San Francisco, the bars in predominantly gay neighborhoods teem with safe-sex posters, baskets of free condoms and fliers for counseling services. Health officials hope that their message sticks in the mind of a patron as he leaves with a willing partner.

But what to do when the meeting place is virtual, yet the sex that follows is just as real? The Stop AIDS Project, a nonprofit agency that has fought the spread of H.I.V. in San Francisco since 1984, is expanding its outreach from the usual venues to include increasingly popular places for arranging sexual encounters: Internet chat rooms.

The San Francisco Department of Public Health last month gave Stop AIDS a $130,000 grant to expand its presence into chat rooms. The agency will train four disease-prevention counselors to roam through chat rooms popular with gay and bisexual men and answer questions about safe sex.

Recent studies have concluded that gay men are more likely to use the Internet to find a sexual partner than lesbians and heterosexuals and that people who use the Internet to arrange sexual encounters are more at risk for sexually transmitted diseases (S.T.D.'s). Health officials say gay men online and in general are not disclosing their H.I.V. status as consistently as they once did.

"If we're working where people are meeting to have sex," said Steven Gibson, program director for Stop AIDS, "we have to find ways to work on the Internet."

While online, Marcel Miranda, the deputy director of outreach and organizing, chats under the moniker StopAIDSMM. He works on an old Macintosh Quadra 610 in the Stop AIDS office, which is between a pet groomer and an exotic leather shop in the mostly gay Castro neighborhood.

Mr. Miranda has answered dozens of queries from chat room participants in the last month. Many express surprise that Stop AIDS is online, then pepper him with sexually explicit questions about what constitutes risky behavior.

Mr. Miranda writes back in graphic prose rarely heard from most disease-prevention counselors.

"We're not the sex police," reads his America Online profile, which any chat room participant can pull up. "We just want to make sure you have the information to make informed choices."

In San Francisco, where city health officials estimate that 15 percent to 20 percent of the adult men are gay, the Internet has become a likely place to find willing sex partners. In chat rooms like one on America Online for gay San Francisco men, homosexuals can scan the profiles of potential dates and carefully choose partners by age, race or sexual interests. Suitors exchange telephone numbers or addresses, then often meet for sexual encounters in which the participants know little more than their partners' online nicknames, said Dr. Jeffrey Klausner, director of the sexually transmitted disease unit at the city's public health department.

The efficiency of such a system worries health officials because it allows diseases to spread outside small groups of partners. In August 1999, San Francisco officials traced a cluster of six syphilis cases back to the AOL chat room. Some of the men with the disease said they knew their partners only by their online nicknames. America Online refused to divulge the men's names to health officials, so PlanetOut, a Web site for homosexuals, was dispatched to advise chat room members to seek disease testing.

"Disease-prevention agencies are chronically understaffed and underfunded," Dr. Klausner said, "so this new venue which facilitates disease transmission places new demands on an already overstretched prevention system."

In a study in San Francisco, which has not yet been published, one-third of the gay men surveyed by public health officials reported having met sexual partners on the Internet in the last year, compared with 13 percent of heterosexual men and 6 percent of women.

"We recognize that at least for some gay men, this is a very common way in which they hook up with other partners," said Dr. Ronald Valdiserri, deputy director of the AIDS division at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta.

The Internet's role in the spread of sexually transmitted diseases is still a relatively small worry for health officials, Dr. Valdiserri said, noting that many people who were at risk could not even afford a computer. However, he said public health workers should present their programs wherever people were meeting for sex, including the Internet.

"Our approaches to H.I.V. and S.T.D. prevention have to evolve as technologies evolve," he said. The Stop AIDS program "is not, in practice, different from providing outreach services on a street corner where injecting drug users might hang out or in a public park after- hours where sex takes place."

Mr. Miranda, 44, proposed the online outreach largely because in the gay chat rooms he visited, men would describe their physical features and sexual interests, but rarely disclosed their H.I.V. status.

"There's a lot of assumption," Mr. Miranda said. "We're not disclosing our H.I.V. status like we were a few years ago."

Several Web portals for homosexuals, like PlanetOut and Gay.com, offer chat sessions and H.I.V.-AIDS resources, but the H.I.V.-AIDS resources are often limited to one section of the site.

For Mr. Miranda and the project team he will soon assemble, the challenge will be getting closer to the action without disrupting the interaction. The grant from the San Francisco health department also includes money for 10 Stop AIDS moderated chat sessions, called cyberforums, and two real-life parties for chatters.

Most Friday evenings around 7, Billy Axelrod, 29, tosses on a red Stop AIDS windbreaker and walks into a bar like the Giraffe, the Cinch or Reflections. He introduces himself to the bartenders, then strikes up conversations with the clientele. At the end of each conversation he asks the other man to fill out a Stop AIDS sex survey.

He suspects that the denizens of an Internet chat room would find that behavior intrusive.

"It's a different culture online - it's a different etiquette," Mr. Axelrod said. "We don't want to go into a chat room and change the nature of what's going on. We want to be a passive presence."

But that method raises concerns for some gay advocates. What's to stop someone with no training from masquerading as a Stop AIDS counselor?

Elizabeth Kennedy, director of community for PlanetOut, said she appreciated the intentions of Stop AIDS but planned to watch how its counselors interacted on PlanetOut.

"Our primary concern is to assure that accountability and reliability are kept a priority," she said. "We'd want to put in systems where users can be assured that people are who they say they are."

Most nights on America Online there are five or six chat rooms specifically for gay and bisexual men in San Francisco, each with 23 slots. On a recent evening, all the rooms were full. A participant in one of the rooms said that Stop AIDS, if it conducted itself properly, should find a welcoming crowd.

"As long as they aren't pushing themselves on people," the person wrote, "I think it's a good thing."

------------------------------
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 15:51:11 -0500 (ET)
From: Edward

Subject: Kissing may spread Kaposis sarcoma

Grabbed from one of the news WWW sites.

Edward
-------------------
Kissing may spread Kaposi's sarcoma

Virus that causes AIDS-related cancer found in saliva

Nov. 8 - A form of the herpes virus that causes an AIDS-related skin cancer appears to spread through kissing, researchers report.

HERPES VIRUS 8 was discovered six years ago and causes a skin cancer called Kaposi's sarcoma, which causes purple skin blotches and can also attack the internal organs. In the United States, the cancer occurs almost exclusively in people with AIDS.

Some had suspected that the virus was transmitted through sexual intercourse, but the new research from the University of Washington, reported in this week's New England Journal of Medicine, contradicts that idea.

Doctors had already known that the herpes strain is found in 11 percent to 20 percent of otherwise healthy gay men. Among men infected with the AIDS virus, the rate ranges from 30 percent to 54 percent.

Dr. John Pauk and others tested 39 gay men who were infected with the herpes virus but did not have Kaposi's sarcoma. They found the virus in 30 percent of their saliva samples and mouth swabs, compared with 1 percent of anal and genital samples. When present, the virus levels were also much higher in saliva than in semen.

"The important thing is it suggests that oral-oral contact plays some role in transmission, although more study is needed to confirm that," Pauk said.

The study also found that homosexual men who engaged in "deep kissing" - kissing that involves a lot of contact with saliva - appeared to be at substantially higher risk of catching the virus.

Kissing is not generally considered a high-risk behavior for passing sexually transmitted diseases.

"Our findings suggest that safer sex practices, such as consistent use of condoms, although important in preventing other sexually transmitted infections, may not protect against [herpes virus 8] infection," the researchers said.

The findings are especially significant for people who have AIDS. In healthy people, the virus generally does not cause illness. But like many other diseases that kill people with AIDS, it usually affects those with weakened immune systems. Thirty percent to 50 percent of HIV-infected people who catch herpes virus 8 will eventually get Kaposi's sarcoma.

The research "definitely has public health implications for people infected with HIV," said Dr. Ronald O. Valdiserri of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. However, he said there was not enough data to recommend that people with HIV avoid deep kissing.

Kaposi's sarcoma has been present for centuries in Southern Europe, the Middle East and Africa. But it was rare in the United States until the start of the AIDS epidemic in the early 1980s.

Experts say the virus is still largely confined to homosexuals in the United States, and that is why kissing has not yet spread herpes virus 8 among heterosexuals.

Dr. Anna Wald, another University of Washington researcher, noted that herpes virus 8 is closely related to the common Epstein Barr virus, which causes mononucleosis, long known as the kissing disease.

"Teen-agers tend to get this when they start kissing," she said. "The reason they get Epstein Bar virus and not herpes virus 8 is that most people have Epstein Bar virus, but relatively few have herpes virus 8."

Dr. Patrick S. Moore of Columbia University, who discovered the virus, said exposure to saliva may explain the high rate of infection in parts of Africa, where more than 70 percent of people may carry herpes virus 8.

Other forms of the herpes virus cause chicken pox, shingles, cold sores and genital herpes.

The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 18:20:04 -0800
From: "jbellag"

Subject: RE: Kissing may spread Kaposis sarcoma

So what's the point.

There are three things that come to mind when I get this kind of stuff:

1. Stories like this have every element that makes for good news paper sales. That's why they get published. The word "MAY" covers a lot of territory.

2. If we all live in fear, no one will have sex with anyone and the human race will no longer exist. (Huh, might not be a bad idea).

3. Be responsible in your sexuality, remember, even sex with yourself can be dangerous.

end of comment.

------------------------------
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 18:43:49 -0800
From: "Ben Boxer"

Subject: Election protests

Ben Boxer notes: I have been reading the world press and its reported opinions of the election. The consensus appears to be that democracy is working because both candidates are waiting on the sidelines to see what happens next instead of pushing each other aside or allowing their supporters to muscle in and seize power. There is also much shaking of heads over the antiquated Electoral College. The Electoral College has been an issue in other elections as well, but it has always died down the instant the losing side concedes and the new powerline is established. What is happening now is unprecedented. It may be the straw that breaks the back of the Electoral College system if enough people rise up in protest. A subscriber to one of the lists has posted a Web site which records what some people are doing about it. I found it very interesting. It may also interest some of you. The protests are scheduled for Saturday, November 11, 2000, which happens to be the day the Electoral College meets in Washington, D.C. However, it all may be resolved by then anyway, so don't get too excited yet!

Headline:
Saturday 11/11 Pro-Democracy Protests: 1PM

Text:
The nightmare has come true: A candidate has won the popular vote but lost the White House. Even worse, it looks like election fraud and error in Florida is responsible. There are two possible solutions: First, It is important to understand that the constitution DOES NOT require the electoral college to vote state-by-state using a "winner take all" system. It is perfectly constitutional for the electors to represent the popular vote. Bush should step down and ask electors to cast their vote for Gore. If the guy who got the most votes doesn't win, then IT ISN'T DEMOCRACY!

Of course we can't count on Bush to do that, therefore a revote should be held in Palm Beach County, where over 19,000 Gore voters' ballots were thrown away. Bush's lead in Florida is less than 2,000 votes.

We The People need to show the media and the parties that this will not stand.

When Slobodan Milosevic clung to power after a narrow election defeat, thousands of protesters rallied in every Yugoslav city, forcing him to give up. Wouldn't it be ironic if democracy was today stronger in Serbia than in the USA?

The Web site is located at http://geocities.com/countercoup/
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 00:23:20 -0800
From: "Ben Boxer"
Subject: Frank coasts to easy victory

Ben Boxer notes: Barney Frank is one of my personal heroes. He is openly gay and has great presence which demands respectful attention to his opinon whether people approve of his sexual orientation or not. He makes no pointless display of being gay, but simply IS what he IS. IMHO, that's the way it should be.

Headline:
Frank coasts to easy victory
(The Advocate, 11/08/00)

Text:
Openly gay representative Barney Frank coasted to an easy victory over his Republican challenger, Martin Travis, a commercial consultant. Frank won 76% of the vote cast in his Massachusetts district, while Travis won 22% of the vote.

(The following is from an article on the Web site of Podium Productions Ltd.)

United States Congressman Barney Frank was one of the first openly gay U.S. politicians. First elected to Congress in 1980, and now serving his tenth consecutive term in the U.S. House of Representatives, Barney Frank has distinguished himself with his impressive track record.

In a recent evaluation of Congress, The Almanac of American Politics said "Frank is one of the intellectual and political leaders of the Democratic Party ... political theorist and pit bull at the same time."

A powerful and engaging speaker, he is a fierce proponent of legalized same-sex marriages, sexual orientation counseling in public schools, gays and lesbians in the military, and a multitude of other civil rights issues.
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:40:44 +0100

From: "SGMS"

Subject: Re: Frank coasts to easy victory

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Boxer"
To: "@FoxList"
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 9:23 AM

Subject: Frank coasts to easy victory

A powerful and engaging speaker, he is a fierce proponent of legalized same-sex marriages, sexual orientation counseling in public schools, gays and lesbians in the military, and a multitude of other civil rights issues.

And he looks absolutely delicious!

Wonder how Barak felt about shaking a gay man's hand....

GRS
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 05:36:38 -0800
From: "Ben Boxer"

Subject: Re: Frank coasts to easy victory

Well, since Israel recently lowered the age of sexual consent for homosexual males to 16, finally matching the same age as that permitted for lesbians and heterosexuals, I suspect it was a glad hand he extended because I am sure he felt it made him look good to a new constituency of teen-age boys! Privately, he probably cringed, undoubtedly aware of ol' Barney's once famous penchant for party boys of the commercial variety (over 17, of course)! BTW, what is the legal age for gay male sex in France these days?

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "SGMS"
To: "@FoxList"
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 1:40 AM

Subject: Re: Frank coasts to easy victory

Wonder how Barak felt about shaking a gay man's hand....

GRS
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 15:51:22 +0100
From: "SGMS"

Subject: Re: Frank coasts to easy victory

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Boxer"
To: "@FoxList"
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 2:36 PM

Subject: Re: Frank coasts to easy victory

(over 17, of course)! BTW, what is the legal age for gay male sex in France these days?

I *suppose* it's 16 like (almost) everywhere else in the E.U. Being 33 myself, attracted to older men, and therefore not worried about age limits and the like, I have to admit I've never paid much attention to that kind of issue.

Mind you, not many people *do* heed the law in that kind of domain. The French aren't into underage stuff anyway on the whole, and there are sufficient right-wing extremists (thwarted would-be aristocrats with names which begin with "De La" or "Du") in the police and justice system who will bust you anyway for public disorder or indecent exposure whatever your age is.

GRS
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 07:26:05 -0800
From: "Ben Boxer"

Subject: Fw: Frank coasts to easy victory

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "SGMS"
To: "@FoxList"
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 6:51 AM

Subject: Re: Frank coasts to easy victory

The French aren't into underage stuff anyway on the whole, and there are sufficient right-wing extremists.... GRS
============
Ben Boxer laughs:
Like everywhere else these days, i.e. Tehran, Kabul and Virginia Beach. Speaking of right-wingers, I am still giggling about small signs I saw posted in country fields all over Normandy in 1987 when I spent a week of driving around the Norman and Breton coasts and sipping Calvados after dinner. It was when the extremist Le Con was vying for power. The signs read: "Le Con con" and that was it. As I understood it, that meant "Idiot Le Con." Was I right? The French get so wonderfully graphic in politics, although confusing (like the current election).
--------------------------
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 05:00:46 -0800
From: "Ben Boxer"

Subject: The Only Votes that Really Count

Ben Boxer says: Everybody wants to know about the Electoral College ONLY when election time comes, mostly after the fact. This year, of course, lack of knowledge about it has made some people go out on a limb and scream and yell, but I have pulled together some facts below Bob's letter to help you understand what the College is.

Of course, what is really going on at this time has little to do with the Electoral College and a lot to do with the same bipartisan fighting that has blighted our government since the Democrats took away the White House from the Republicans in 1992, fighting which has at least temporarily changed the character of the way business is done in Washington's corridors of power. The spirit of compromise, if not dead, is lame, like our present lame-duck presidency.

I have found this election both fascinating and exciting, as I did the presidential races between Harry Truman and Tom Dewey in 1948, John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon in 1960, and the heady time of my intense involvement in the early days of Ross Perot's 1992 run when I campaigned for him in Northern Nevada.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Feinstein" > To: "Ben Boxer"
Cc: "0Dlist"
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 2:48 AM

Subject: Democracy?

Hi, Bob and guide dog Harley here. It has always troubled me that we still have the electoral college system; it has been established that Gore won in the popular vote, but still may not be elected. This is not democracy to my way of thinking. I think that all elections should be based on one person, one vote, and whoever gets the majority wins. I do not understand the reasons for the electoral college system, or why it has been let to stand. I know it had something to do with the north against the south.

Bob and Harley

(Ben Boxer presents info below on the Electoral College.)

Headline:
Excerpts from "The Electoral College: The Only Votes that Really Count"
(By Adam Zoll, Britannica.com)

Text:
As many voters who went to the polls November 7 now are learning, their vote does not directly elect the next president of the United States. Instead they have decided who from their statewhether Democrat, Republican, or otherwill choose the next president for them. These special representatives, or electors, are known collectively as the electoral college, and the role they play in the American political system has come under scrutiny as a result of this year's tight presidential election. The outcome of the Bush-Gore contest ultimately will be determined by that uniquely American brand of political calculus known as electoral math. Electoral votes are apportioned to each of the 50 states based on its number of congressional seats. The 538 total electoral votes come from the number of Senate seats (100), which are divided equally among the states, and House seats (435), which are divided according to a state's population, with additional electoral votes for the District of Columbia (3). To win a candidate must receive a majority of electoral votes--currently 270. If no candidate gets a majority of electoral votes, the election is thrown to the House of Representatives, where each state casts a vote for one of the three top contenders. Once again, a majority is required. The popular vote, while often suggesting who wins the election, is essentially meaningless. The distribution of votes from state to state is what actually determines the winner. Or, to rephrase Bill Clinton's 1992 campaign mantra: It's the electoral vote, stupid.

The electoral college is an invention of the Founding Fathers, who, in drafting the Constitution, sought a way to achieve a national consensus at a time of fierce local partisanship. By giving each elector two votes and requiring that at least one be for someone not from his own state, the organizers hoped to foster national unity in the selection of a president.

It was once common for states to split their electors based on the voting breakdown within the state. Today the candidate that wins a state takes all of its electoral votes in every state except Maine and Nebraska. Each state decides for itself how to award its electoral votes.

Electors are usually state party officials or others chosen by the party for their loyalty, but in rare instances some have voted for candidates other than their party's nominee. In 1976, for example, a Washington elector voted for Ronald Reagan instead of the Republican Party's nominee, Gerald Ford, and in 1988 a West Virginia elector voted for Democratic vice presidential candidate Lloyd Bentsen for president and for presidential candidate Michael Dukakis for vice president. Many states try to guard against such "faithless electors" by administering fines or other penalties to those who are said to betray the public's trust.

Despite election day fanfare and screaming newspaper headlines announcing the winner in most presidential elections, the outcome does not become official until more than a month later. On the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December (Dec. 18 this year), electors gather in each state to vote for president and vice president. They then send the results to Congress, where votes from all the states are counted on January 6. Two weeks later, on January 20, the candidate who received the greatest number of electoral votes is inaugurated as president.

------------------------------
End of silverfoxesclub-digest V1 #41
************************************