NOTE: Some postings may have been deleted at the discretion of Ben Boxer. Erotic pictures posted on the regular version of the list are automatically deleted from the digest and are archived separately. Viewing them requires a password available only to members. Profiles posted to the list are also moved into a separate viewing area, but do not require a password. Click here to browse through them.

Silverfoxesclub-digest
Monday, June 18 2001
Volume 01 : Number 276

In this issue:

-That rascal Aretino, again!
-Re: Control of sexuality
-Theatre faces anger over explicit gay sex production

----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Ben Boxer" benboxer@mediaone.net
Subject: That rascal Aretino, again!

The career break of Pietro Aretino (1492-1556) came when he wrote a mock last will and testament in 1516 for Pope Leo X's pet elephant, Hanno, complete with bequeathing the beast's genitals to one of the lustier cardinals. From then on, he became infamous in Italy as one of the lewdest and wittiest writers, the Renaissance mouth that roared.

In 1524, Aretino wrote sonnets to accompany the drawings of sixteen sexual positions by Giuliano Romano, Raphael's talented twenty-five-year-old pupil. Their collaboration produced one of history's most notorious works of erotic art.

Casanova in his memoirs mentions spending New Year's Eve 1753 with a nun doing Aretino's "straight tree" position, which he says featured the man standing and holding the woman upside-down for mutual oral sex.

Aretino barely escaped prison for his involvement in the Sixteen Postures, but it certainly didn't teach him to mend his ways.

He attained considerable wealth and influence, in part through literary flattery and blackmail. Little is known of his early years, but by 1527 he had settled permanently in Venice. Among Aretino.s friends and patrons were some of the most prominent figures of his time, several of whom gave him gold chains such as the one he wears in the Titian portrait attached to this posting. Clement VII made Aretino a Knight of Rhodes, and Julius III named him Knight of St. Peter. He was on intimate terms with Titian, who painted at least three portraits of him.

Despite the exclusively heterosexual natural of his naughty sonnets (one of which does, however, praise anal intercourse), Aretino himself was a well-known homosexual, and wrote such works as "Il Marescalo," a play in which a Mantuan courtier marries a girl whom he later discovers - to his delight - to be a young man in disguise.

We have already met Aretino on the list, in Digest 257, June 2001, in a bawdy selection from "The Wandering Whore" featuring a gay priest in Rome. He was called "Aretino," by the way, because he came from the town of Arezzo in Tuscany, which you visited if you saw Roberto Benigni's beautiful Italian film, "Life is Beautiful." Arezzo is also Benigni's town, and was the setting for much of the film.

Here is a brief selection from one of gay Aretino's Renaissance sonnets, heterosexual in nature, but homosexual in spirit. All except a very few copies of this book were promptly burnt by the Church. No surviving complete copy is known to exist. It's easy to see why the Church tried to destroy his work. He pulled no punches. His writings were as salacious as anything in the pornographic genre today.

Sampling of a sonnet:

HE:
It would be a dumb-ass thing to do,
If I were allowed to fuck you,
To place my dick in your pussy,
Choosing that instead of the rear end.
May my lineage die out with me!
I'd like to fuck you back there many times,
Since the round part's different from the slash
As malmsey from watered-down wine.

SHE:
Fuck me, do whatever you want
In the pussy and ass -- it's all the same to me
Where you do what you have to do.
In both the pussy and ass I'm aflame:
All the mules, asses, and oxen in the world
With their dicks could not cool my lust.
In any case you'd cut a poor figure
Doing it the old-fashioned way.
If I were a man, I'd never want pussy.
------------------------------
From: George of Boston bostbill@ix.netcom.com
Subject: Re: Control of sexuality

"Jon Kepler" wrote: My question is, why choose such a difficult one to control? I suppose that if you can control such a strong urge as sexuality you have reached the control pinnacle."

Dear Jon,
I believe you have expressed a very important point. Historically, control of sexuality has been widely used as a means of controlling a population.

Examples include the following:
(1) control of who you may copulate with (their age, social relationship, genetic relationship, their sex, their "race", etc, etc);
(2) when you may or may not copulate with permitted partners (in relation to their menstrual cycle, in relation to the religious calendar, etc.);
(3) what courtship and mating behaviors are allowed, and what sexual behaviors are permitted when copulating (this position is OK but that one is not);
(4) control over masturbation (sometimes permissible for population control, in other situations always impermissible in order to outbreed competing groups);

and in our modern period technology has expanded the range of possible control to include (5) control over abortion and use of contraceptives.

These controls have not always been exercised exclusively by religious leaders. Government leaders today as always find control of sexuality to be very appealing.

The price paid by sexual non-conformists has usually been highest among the parts of the world where the three "religions of the book" have been prominent. I mean Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

Both Christianity and Islam had periods of many centuries in which they tolerated same sex sexual behaviors, then seemingly had a change of heart.

As Jon said so well, "... if you can control such a strong urge as sexuality you have reached the control pinnacle".

George of Boston (Boston Bill)
http://bostbill.home.netcom.com
------------------------------
From: "Ben Boxer" benboxer@mediaone.net
Subject: Theatre faces anger over explicit gay sex production

Headline:
National Theatre faces anger over explicit gay sex production
(The Sunday Times)

Text:
The National Theatre (England) is facing the wrath of family values campaigners for its plans to stage a period comedy featuring graphic depictions of gay sex.

The play, "Mother Clap's Molly House," set in London in 1726 in a "molly house" - a homosexual meeting place - and interspersed with a contemporary story line, is a new work by Mark Ravenhill whose first play, Shopping and F******, provoked outrage for its explicit content and the desolation of its characters.

Critics fear his move to the National, which is part-funded by taxpayers and whose most recent success has been Martine McCutcheon in My Fair Lady - will prompt a row of proportions unseen since The Romans in Britain was staged in 1980.

That play, which featured Roman soldiers raping a young Briton, caused Mary Whitehouse, the taste and decency campaigner, to attempt to bring a private prosecution under the Sexual Offences Act.

"Putting it [Ravenhill's play] on at our National with taxpayers' money seems to me to be designed to affront traditional family values," said Gerald Howarth, chairman of the Lords and Commons Family and Child Protection Group.

The National has recently come under criticism that with Trevor Nunn's directorship it has staged too many "safe" and commercial plays. Mother Clap's Molly House seems likely to change all that.

"There is sodomy, but I think National audiences can probably take sodomy on the chin, if that's where you take it," Ravenhill said last week. The play opens on September 4.

John Beyer, director of Mediawatch UK, the new name for Whitehouse's National Viewers and Listeners' Association, said: "What goes on at the National is the face of modern Britain and I think people will be very surprised."

Despite his confidence in modern audiences, Ravenhill's mother has yet to see one of his plays. "I haven't come up with one suitable yet," he said.
------------------------------

End of silverfoxesclub-digest V1 #276
************************************