| NOTE: Some postings may have been deleted at the discretion of Ben Boxer. Erotic pictures posted on the regular version of the list are automatically deleted
from the digest and are archived separately. Viewing them requires a password
available only to members. Profiles posted to the list are also moved into a separate viewing area, but do not require a password. Click here to browse through them.
Silverfoxesclub-digest In this issue:
-Seeing a Liturgical Loophole, Minister Defies a Ban on Same-Sex , Unions
-It's me again...
-Re: Silverfox: After Doing it in a Hammock (5)
-Gay couples fathering children together?
-Favor
-Re: Silverfox: Dad's unit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Edward eho01@alumni.poly.edu
Subject: Seeing a Liturgical Loophole, Minister Defies a Ban on Same-Sex , Unions
From today's NY Times.
Edward
- ----------------------
January 2, 2001
Seeing a Liturgical Loophole, Minister Defies a Ban on Same-Sex
Unions
By THE NEW YORK TIMES
CHICAGO, Jan. 1 - A United Methodist minister who was
suspended in 1999 for blessing the union of two gay men has
returned to his North Side church and is once again celebrating
same-sex unions.
This time, though, he has found a way for his Broadway United
Methodist Church community to hold the service without breaking
the laws of the parent church.
The minister, the Rev. Greg Dell, had his church homecoming in
July after a yearlong suspension, the first under a 1996 church law
that forbids pastors to officiate at same-sex unions and bans the
ceremony from occurring on church grounds. Now, Mr. Dell says,
he has found a loophole in the rule.
Mr. Dell's new church policy on same-sex unions slips through the
"order and discipline" law by changing the who and where of the
ceremony. What his church has done, Mr. Dell said, is simple.
"We hold the ceremony away from church grounds, and I don't
preside over the union," he said. "That's all it is."
One recent ceremony was held at a home, where the couple
exchanged vows with friends and Mr. Dell present. The next day a
service of celebration was held in the sanctuary of the church,
where the couple received communion and repeated their vows.
The new policy, introduced by the Broadway church in September,
is the latest in a series of alternative actions taken by Mr. Dell and
other ministers across the country in an effort to allow same-sex
unions within the confines of the United Methodist Church, the
nation's second-largest Protestant denomination after the Southern
Baptist Convention.
The United Methodist Church has 8.5 million members and
maintains a wide spectrum of ideologies. There has recently been
a surge in the number of Methodist congregations opposing the
ban on same-sex unions.
This opposition is part of a movement by religious organizations
across the country to recognize and administer faith services to
gay and lesbian parishioners.
Since September, Mr. Dell said, his church, which has a racially,
socially and sexually diverse congregation, has celebrated a
handful of same-sex unions, a ceremony he says he cannot ignore
if he is to minister to his 200-member congregation, 35 percent to
40 percent of which consists of gay men and lesbians.
In Mr. Dell's view, the union is a covenant blessed by God, not by
the minister. Following this interpretation, vows are shared between
the couple and God, and the minister and the community are mere
observers and celebrants of the union.
By removing the pastor and the church setting, the Broadway
congregation has provoked reactions running the gamut from praise
for a groundbreaking principle that others may follow to criticism
that the policy disregards church law.
"It's really been something of a spectrum," Mr. Dell said. "Those in
the religious right are really enraged. They see it as something of a
disobedience. And those in the middle have comments ranging
from `Isn't that clever?' to `They are walking close to the line.' "
One of Mr. Dell's critics, James V. Heidinger II, president of the
Good News Caucus, an evangelical renewal movement, contends
that the removal of the minister from the service "trivializes the
ceremony by virtually removing the pastor's role."
"This is not a tangential issue," Mr. Heidinger said. "It goes right at
the heart of what we believe about marriage. It seems to us that
what the church has done is to find a clever way to circumvent the
Book of Discipline and its standards. To do it outside in a courtyard
or away from the church and to let them go into the church and
celebrate it seems like they are clearly ignoring and evading the
letter, and more so the spirit, of church policy."
Within the Broadway church, support for the policy is widespread.
"The sense of unity around the policy has been very strong," said
Eva Dahm, a lay leader. "It is not the ideal situation, of course, but
it's all we can do right now, and so everybody is taking it in stride."
At the General Conference of the United Methodist Church in
Cleveland last May, when the denomination's governing body
affirmed the ban on same-sex unions within the church, Mr. Dell
was one of several members of the clergy who staged a protest
and were arrested.
On his return to his congregation two months later, Mr. Dell said,
he decided that creating the new union policy was the best short-
term answer for his congregation. The policy "is something of a
compromise without violating the integrity of the ceremony," he
said.
Others within the denomination say Mr. Dell and the Broadway
church are clearing a new path.
"It's interesting to me that they've adopted this," said Jack Tuell, a
retired bishop who presided at Mr. Dell's 1999 trial, "and perhaps it
will provide a model that others may greatly appreciate."
Although no formal complaints have been brought against his
church, Mr. Dell admits that the policy may be challenged in the
future - that future being the next General Conference in 2004.
"I'm not expecting we'll have a complaint filed against us, but I
wouldn't be shocked," he said. "They could tighten the loophole,
and already this policy is something of a compromise, but a
compromise of practice, not of integrity."
------------------------------
From: TexasPenguin@AOL.COM
Subject: It's me again...
Greetings and salutations to one and all,
I would like everyone to know that I sincerely appreciate all of the help and
the emails that I have received thus far. I am going to share some requested
information to elaborate on the situation further.
I am 22 years old, my lover turns 52 this month. His daughter is not the
same age as I, she is six years older. There was no physical tension between
his daughter and myself when we first met or at dinner last night. What
bothered me about her was something that I couldn't pinpoint. Her presence
just bugged me and perhaps it could be that I just need to adapt to her
presence in our life. I think there will always be tension between his
daughter and myself, at least for now. She has promised to keep in touch
with him and this statement just made me on edge.
After I sent my email last night to the list, my lover and I sat down and we
have talked about what is going to happen. He has told me that he loves me
very much and does not want me to leave because she is now back in his life.
We are very happy together and although this has changed things, he has told
me that it doesn't have to change what the two of us have together. I
realize that his daughter is a different part of his life and that I am
another part. I always expected the two parts to remain separate and now
they have all come together and like pouring a can of soda into a glass,
things have become agitated. But like the soda in the glass, if given enough
time, things settle.
I have attached a picture of the two of us together. This was taken New
Year's Eve, one day after his daughter came back into his life and one day
before the tension would really build up...
Once again, I do want to thank each and every person who has responded and
given advice. I love each and every one of you for it and I am taking all of
the advice into account to analyze how I feel.
Sincerely,
Peter/The Penguin
- -------------------
Work as if you don't need the money.
Love as if you've never been hurt.
Dance like there's nobody watching.
Here endeth, The Penguin's email.
------------------------------
From: "Digital Artistry" deusex@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: Silverfox: After Doing it in a Hammock
Boston Bill wrote:
Most Spanish nouns and adjectives used as nouns are quite specific
about the gender...el gordo = the fat man...la gorda = the fat woman.
- -----------
But BB, could you ever explain to the world why Taco Bell sells a food
product called a Gordita? (Little fat lady)
That one always made me go Hmmmm????
- -Mike
------------------------------
From: Leo Bear leobear00@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Food & restaurant names
Gordita nothin, what about the Mexican restaurant called Chi Chi's?
------------------------------
From: jc jkatt@specent.com
Subject: Boston Bill
Boston Bill is a cutey!!!
------------------------------
Ben Boxer agrees: He sure is! Take another look at
------------------------------
End of silverfoxesclub-digest V1 #96
|