| NOTE: Some postings may have been deleted at the discretion of Ben Boxer. Erotic pictures posted on the regular version of the list are automatically deleted
from the digest and are archived separately. Viewing them requires a password
available only to members. Profiles posted to the list are also moved into a separate viewing area, but do not require a password. Please click here to browse through them.
Silverfoxesclub-digest Thursday, December 7 2000 Volume 01 : Number 068
In this issue:
-Re: Many, many questions! (+ responses)
-Church defies Lutheran order
-Somebody left the list
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 00:57:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Robert Feinstein
Subject: Re: Many, many questions\!
Thank you for mentioning that I am blind, because I don't think the guy
who said that anyone who is in full possession of his physical faculties
can use a search engine realized it, or at least I hope he didn't, because
if he did, he was being very nasty. What people need to understand is
that if someone asks for help or a question, even if it seems easy or
self-evident, there's usually a good reason.
Bob and Harley Dog
================
An addendum from Ben Boxer:
He did not know of your blindness, Bob, and has written contritely to me
expressing chagrin that he leapt in without knowing. The information he
supplied, however, was useful to those of us who are sighted, and I
am grateful for it. My compliments to the gentleman who wrote to the
list in your defense, Bob. Rest assured no unkindness was intended.
We all know we must tread carefully around you, Bob, because Harley
the guide dog may be a sweetie pie, but he's a big son-of-a-bitch none
of us wants to tangle with when he gets pissed. GRRRRRRRRROWL!
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 02:20:53 -0500
From: "Digital Artistry"
Subject: Re: Many, many questions!
> Thank you for mentioning that I am blind, because I don't think the guy
> who said (etc)
Hi Bob,
The gentleman who posted that remark has been around in the various
silverfox type communities for a long time now and I know he'd never have
written anything
nasty just for the sake of being mean. He may be caustic at times but we're
all like that now and again. I used to have a friend, his name was Austin,
who was blind and used a text to speech system on his computer. Somehow he
could understand the contraption but to me it spoke so fast it might as well
have been an alien language. I think that by listening to things that
quickly he often misunderstood what was being written and took it the wrong
way. An example comes to mind. A group of guys I was hanging around with
online created an ANSI graphic with all sorts of bright colors and so forth
and named it "Austin Vision", which I thought was kind of insulting and
rude. Since Austin couldn't see the picture in question he didn't understand
half of what was being said and got mad at me for yelling at our friends for
doing it. He wound up not wanting to talk to me when in reality I was
actually just trying to tell off our friends for acting like immature jerks.
But it all comes down to the translation.I think E-Mail is a whole other
language unto itself. Certainly it's not the same as spoken English. I think
we all tend to speak differently than we type and say things we'd never say
in person when we write mail. Not having the benefit of tonal inflections
and so forth only serves to complicate things even more. One day perhaps we
will all use a text to speech converter to have our E-Mail read to us and it
will understand inflections. Those silly smiley faces people type :) could
tell the software how to read the line of text before it and so forth. Boy,
wouldn't that make things easier? Add in some downloadable voice patterns
and people could send you their own so their mail would always sound like
they do in person. I think the technology is already in existence for just
such a thing. What do you think?
Regards,
Mike
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 06:28:32 -0800
From: "Ben Boxer"
Subject: Church defies Lutheran order
Ben Boxer says: Within the context of Lutheran
canon law, the incident reported below
constitutes an act of civil disobedience on the
part of a courageous congregation. Bravo! The
day is upon us when reasonable and fair-minded
citizens must set out themselves to correct
egregious rulings by so-called authorities. Maybe
next we will read about a large Boy Scout troop
inviting gay boys and gay scoutmasters into
fellowship with them in defiance of BSA national
policy. Perhaps an American cardinal will
denounce the present pope's homophobia and
publicly throw open the doors of his cathedral to
homosexuals. We may even read of students at a
large high school in the South organizing a
vigilante group of straight kids, led by the
captain of the football team, to patrol the halls
and protect gay students from bashing.
Ha ha! Dream on, baby!
Headline:
Church to defy Lutheran order by ordaining
noncelibate lesbian pastor
(The Advocate, 12/06/00)
Text:
The congregation at the St. Paul-Reformation
Lutheran Church in St. Paul, Minn., voted
1760 Sunday to ordain a lesbian pastor, the St.
Paul Pioneer Press reports. The decision to
ordain Anita Hill, who has served as a minister at
the church since 1983, is a violation of a
long-standing Evangelical Lutheran Church law
banning the ordination of noncelibate gay or
lesbian pastors. Our process leading to todays
decision has been thoughtful and intentional,"
said church copresident John Whalen in a
statement. The path weve taken is consistent
with our understanding of what it means to be
Lutheran and our commitment to inclusive
ministry.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 06:28:17 -0800
From: "Ben Boxer"
Subject: Somebody left the list
Some guy left this list today of his own accord. What pissed him off about
it was that he ONLY wanted to see pix of smooth-faced silverfoxes. He didn't
want to see pix of any other ages or types. He didn't want to read any
articles or comments by anyone. Etcetera.
I was not sorry that he left. That kind of narrow-mindedness does not belong
on a Ben Boxer list. It's OK to make your choices, but it's not OK to get
pissy because your buddies may think differently.
This list is for men of all ages who think in many different directions. We
have one major bond: we comprise a maligned minority throughout the world.
That is enemy enough. Among ourselves, we need to look away from what we
don't like about each other and share what we do like together.
Never forget that the DELETE key is a disgruntled subscriber's friendliest
recourse.
------------------------------
End of silverfoxesclub-digest V1 #68
************************************
|